Baton Rouge Show + Ramblings

Tue Jan 12, 2010 6:43 pm


CLICK THE LINK FOR TICKETS TO THE SHOW.

This Show. Many or exactly none of you might be asking - "why do a show right now?... or why do this show when there's all this other important stuff I'm sure you're doing although - we don't know what the h_ll that might be since no one is saying anything and to be perfectly honest, it's kind of weird..."

Simply, a promoter in Baton Rouge persisted (since way back when we were out w/ SA) and we finally accepted. FACT: Louisiana got totally passed over on every Eisley headlining tour since 2005. We had an unexpected international gig conflict...then hurricanes came, levy's broke... then agents weren't booking shows because of the sad path of destruction in New Orleans, etc. We figured we were past due on an La. show.

Now, if you're in Montana, yep... we dissed you too, but there aren't any Eisley fans in Montana except the Marlboro Man. He is real and he is Chad Kroeger's dad. He is a fan, as I said, but he rides his horse all the way to Boise, Idaho for Eisley shows... so we don't need to tour Montana. Maybe a few other states will complain. If they do, I am prepared.

btw - the openers are local to Baton Rouge and seem vibey and soft and musical and quirky. I think this will work. The promoter seems cool and wants us back on our next tour. New markets, here we come. Some of you Texans should make the trek... or how about some Mississippians.

Again, if you want to go: http://tinyurl.com/yf47nd7


Sherri shooting a Wes'/Jes' shower

What is going on?! Everyone already knows: a double wedding. If that isn't enough, I don't know what is. It certainly is enough. And if anyone has is dark-sided or distrusting enough to think that the band is over their band simply because there's some hitchin' goin' on, think again. You should read the emails, hear our conversations. The inactivity is driving them bady... bonkers... whacko. They are chomping... no for real - like actually 'chomping'... things like sticks and even those chewy dog bones in the back yard. It's pretty bad. But it's better to have this delay happen now then to have an album out and not be able to tour/promote it, right? Ok.

Oh, and plus - we had those holidays after that long tour... and now it's a few weeks before the wedding. Soon we'll be on a faster track.


Gumbo lures church folk to afternoon showers for both couples on different
dates. The first was a huge success. Kim's S. Louisiana Cajun gumbo rules.
Even Paul of Mute Math said it was the best he'd ever tasted. He's from New
Orleans. The man knows his gumbo. So do I.





Being in a band - I recently tweeted a stat I read in RS magazine: "In a year when the last major retailer, Virgin Megastore, shut down, CD sales sank another 19%...". The rest of that long quote read: "...and even though the long-booming touring business started to slide, the music industry got a much-needed boost from a couple of it's biggest-ever acts: Michael Jackson and the Beatles. After his June 25th death, the King of Pop sold 7 million albums, 10.2 million song downloads and 1.3 million DVD's, not to mention more than $72 million in tickets for his movie, This is It. The Beatles followed in Sept. with... 2 million records... 1 million copies of Rock Band. but to many in the industry, this was foreboding news. "The music these artists made has stood the test of time, "... The bad thing is there aren't new artists whose careers have transecnded the changing habits of consumers."

My comment is not so much about why other artists are not transcending trends or surviving 50 years... it's that CD sales dropped another 19%. Try lopping off 20% of your body parts... then go get a check up. You're in bad shape... but to get a real diagnosis you have to subtract more other limbs; remember there has been high loppage happening for years now... percentages taken away from that 100% whole. You're barely alive.

But you're actually doing fine. Because the "you're" in this story isn't you... or even bands... it's labels. Remember - they still have to sell those physical plastic compact disc thingies... well, unless they're one of the majors who have shifted their business model to the 360˚deal... which is nearly 100% of them. I'm quite sure those labels think everything is back to normal... that everything is fine... that they'll get big chunks of everything that bands make... and they'll survive. But I don't think they will.


Found this on line. Appears in several sites.

"The Re-tooled Industry". This is not going to be profound; it's old news... but I'm always thinking of a way to articulate ideas that seem easy to understand but lack profoundness. Music has always been accessed by a tangible/physical thing but for the first time since the evolution of music storage (cylindrical Edison recordings > vinyl disc records > tapes > cd's) the tangible has been replaced - not by a new thing - but by a distribution method. The mp3 is just X's and O's. It's a digital thing, not a tangible thing. With the birth of the mp3 and iTunes, labels lost both the tangible thing to sell and the distribution to sell it. Apple put the tangible case into the hands of every music lover on planet earth... then they sold the intangible to that audience. Labels could have grabbed up this real estate but couldn't see it.

All they're doing now is trying to recover from a fatal mistake. They were accused of taking too much from the artists they were stealing from... but now they're taking way more. In my opinion, this is just another cycle... it has a fuse and a timer.

This is one of my favorite quotes: "we literally come into the office every day, scratch our heads and try to figure out how to compete with free". No source but it's an accurate paraphrase from the president of a major label.

Gotta get back to work. Stay tuned.

bd

20 Comments

grain thrower
Oh, and it's spelled 'Maybruary,' a lot of people get that wrong. Smile

posted Sat Jan 16, 2010 10:36 am
boyd
yeah, it's not really even an unwritten law... but it seems to be the case - (2 year cycle). My point is - there should be a stream of music coming from a band. What else? It's what bands do. Labels should pay to record live, push to record all kinds of A, B sides, video, garage band... music. Record it and get it out there. People are a.d.d. There are a zillion bands to steal attention. Why let the dust settle on your music... keep putting it out there. It doesn't have to be super expensive.

posted Sat Jan 16, 2010 1:04 pm
wilsmith
"Now, if you're in Montana, yep... we dissed you too, but there aren't any Eisley fans in Montana except the Marlboro Man. He is real and he is Chad Kroeger's dad. He is a fan, as I said, but he rides his horse all the way to Boise, Idaho for Eisley shows... so we don't need to tour Montana." Laughing

Comedic genius right there.

Lots of indie bands that eventually broke into the mainstream did it on the heals of Record-a-year, or constant EP releases. The 70's (and late 60's) was pretty wicked for that, 66-70 (the Big Bang of Rock) saw almost every major artist with a record near annually if not more frequently. Hendrix, Beatles, Stones, the Who, Creedence (Yes Creedence!), Neil Young, Joni and many many more... If Eisley wants to start a revival, I'm all for it!

posted Sun Jan 17, 2010 5:06 pm
boyd
You are the real will smith, right? nice to have the prince of bellaire tuning in. Either way, savvy response. yes. want to start a revival. Will take the right team to do it. wb sux. Imagine having $, power, dept's w/ people, expertise, in-roads into every facet of the industry at highest level and having a great band like Eisley... who write, perform, look, sound, are... great... and not doing anything except release 2 lp's in 6+ years. What about dvd's (wait there was that one failed live taping at the Troubadour. I salvaged it to their dismay but it was only a decent release at best), what about Christmas albums, what about B sides, what about special projects, recordings, incentives, special offers, garage band stuff, limited edition offerings... there were endless opportunities; there should have been an array of products injected into the market. They could have made $ and forwarded Eisley's career... They didn't even release Room Noises in the UK. lame. The new 're-tooled' wb seems no different; comfortable, uninspired, middle management madness... the wheel that squeaks is the wheel that greases their pocketbooks on the short fall. One big mass of mediocrety... with a few exceptions. i do have my favorite people there.

posted Mon Jan 18, 2010 7:36 am
wilsmith
^totally missed that Embarassed Surely you jest Laughing

I'm just the 3rd such named guy in my own family, and have never been further west than Las Vegas. It's a surprising, occasionally embarrassingly common, namesake.

I'm a Willie though, he WAS a Willard Razz, in most press I see they note him as Willard, but if you dig into pre-Biggest-Actor-On-The-Planet documentation, it's Willard.

But, he could be a fan who knows? I wouldn't be surprised if Jada was, or Willow for that matter. At some point I think he took on a stake in label ownership, can't recall for sure.

Oh WB... Where they were WEA, it was a golden age, and when Atlantic was a separate entity, they were wicked. I was partial to Elektra in it's heyday, but now...

In general, when new releases by long out of service artists (semi-retired, retired, or no longer with us) outpace releases by new artists on the labels, i think that pretty much signifies the majors have bought into the disposable music philosophy, and are lukewarm on creating legacy artists.

That's not to say they won't scoop up anyone with that potential off an indie if they do the foundational work all on their own. But it looks like if you get scooped early on, they're going to let you carry on like you're indie until you've gotten to the stage of those Indies they scooped up at their peak.

The neatest deal I saw in the WEA era was DavÍd Garza, who was allowed to run his own indie label and release demos and low-fi records inbetween his Album releases on WB. It only lasted for 2 LPs and 2 Eps for WB and a ton of his own releases. Thing is he'd releases maybe 10 or more things pre-warner and done a lot of touring etc.

posted Fri Jan 22, 2010 4:00 am
boyd
Sorry Will. i gave up on the thread. That's the problem with this format. Comments aren't dynamic. No one is alerted, nothing is pushed. Static death. Anyway... yep, i think you about have it. Working on fixing things.

posted Sun Jan 24, 2010 7:55 pm
wilsmith
No sweat, one negligent turn deserves another and "The Frog" has everybody spinning like mad at this point, so by their standards we are more than on point. But then again, I look at the Billboard sales, and the weekly box office, and the entertainment industry is Deflating. If I was a label head who had to figure out how to compete with Disney's Media factory, partner with Viacom to get my artist exposure, all the while Indies use bloggers, youtube, and myspace and breakthrough... I'd feel disposable, defeated, and reluctant at this point too. The "Majors" are suffering from a case of the Favres.

posted Mon Jan 25, 2010 3:30 am
redboots
every day I'm in class, I find the music business more frustrating (I'm a music biz major). it's been in the process of collapsing for ages... but I guess ya have to know the biz to change the biz.

for now I'll be sitting, waiting, and wishing for LP 3 to come out so I can finally see eisley on tour for the first time. looking forward to it. if you stop in nashville I'll buy the coffee (it's too good to pass up anyway, since all of the local places are amazing).

posted Tue Feb 02, 2010 9:40 am
AutomaticCaity
wow, i am alittle surprised... i was always reading you guys say how great warner bros was and how they were backing you a lot. this makes more sense though.

posted Tue Feb 09, 2010 3:26 pm
VietRebel
:)
I don´t know much about record labels and what goes on behind the scenes but I feel happy that you´re off with WB if you feel it was the right thing for the band. I love Eisley for being Eisley and I don´t want anything stopping you from being who you truly are. As a loyal fan, I whole heartily trust any decisions you make. I know you guys have been working very hard on the new record. I am waiting patiently for it, and you ARE aloud to live a life. Smile

posted Sat Mar 06, 2010 1:24 am