
|
goto page | next >>
|
|
| Author | Message |
|---|---|
|
http://www.songmeanings.net Some of the people who post are spot on with their interpretations, but for every song you look up, there are people with some pretty ridiculous comments. I get a kick out of this site. Check out these beauties: On "Golly Sandra": stacy is singing about a dog? i think of my dog like my child, and a dog's life is very quick.... Sorry, just wanted to try an alternative angle on one tape, when they're playing live...Sherri said the song was about Christie and how much she's grown up and yadayadayada. On "Trolleywood": Sherri DuPree is a fan of Ray Bradbury, so it may have something to do with Dandelion Wine. It makes a lot of sense that it could be about D.W. And the grand prize winner: On "Telescope Eyes" (original): this version of the song is horrible. i can't believe they said 'you freak'. the new version is so much better. _________________ "Hello, Mother Leopard. I have your cub." |
|
|
Joined: 27 Mar 2006 | Posts: 100 | Location: Maryland
|
|
|
Joined: 11 Aug 2005 | Posts: 3181 |
|
|
|
StallionMang wrote: And the grand prize winner:
On "Telescope Eyes" (original): this version of the song is horrible. i can't believe they said 'you freak'. the new version is so much better. I think the loss of "freak" was terrible, but this just goes to show you that it's about perspective. If you heard Room Noises first, you could quite possibly prefer those versions. And, actually, I do agree that the Laughing City EP TE is as close to terrible as Eisley has gotten ... ha. Though the original (demo/EP2) version was not too bad. _________________ My photography:www.jamiemphoto.com You can't spell awesome without emo...backwards! -Julie definingawesome (11:44:11 PM): Eisley shivers our timbers |
|
|
Joined: 15 Aug 2003 | Posts: 25185 | Location: East Texas
|
|
|
TheAntrider wrote: StallionMang wrote: And the grand prize winner:
On "Telescope Eyes" (original): this version of the song is horrible. i can't believe they said 'you freak'. the new version is so much better. I think the loss of "freak" was terrible, but this just goes to show you that it's about perspective. If you heard Room Noises first, you could quite possibly prefer those versions. And, actually, I do agree that the Laughing City EP TE is as close to terrible as Eisley has gotten ... ha. Though the original (demo/EP2) version was not too bad. I thought you were going to bed? ....I looked up to you, man. But now...I just don't know anymore. |
|
|
Joined: 11 Aug 2005 | Posts: 3181 |
|
|
|
Haha!! yeah... I get a kick out of reading some interpretations too. Some people are really off-the-wall sort of characters. Oh well... Music is for all sorts of people anyway. They can interpret it the way they want to. That's the beauty of it. Write a song or draw a picture all sorts of people can relate to. You don't gotta be stringent on the meaning. If a listener wants to think about their dog while listening to "golly sandra," let her be. amen. (ha!) |
|
|
Joined: 21 Jan 2007 | Posts: 31 | Location: Un-Paradise, HI, USA
|
|
|
gregorydymitrowicz wrote: TheAntrider wrote: StallionMang wrote: And the grand prize winner:
On "Telescope Eyes" (original): this version of the song is horrible. i can't believe they said 'you freak'. the new version is so much better. I think the loss of "freak" was terrible, but this just goes to show you that it's about perspective. If you heard Room Noises first, you could quite possibly prefer those versions. And, actually, I do agree that the Laughing City EP TE is as close to terrible as Eisley has gotten ... ha. Though the original (demo/EP2) version was not too bad. I thought you were going to bed? ....I looked up to you, man. But now...I just don't know anymore. Ha. I spent almost 4 hours attempting to. I had to take a breather from caffeine-induced tossing and turning. _________________ My photography:www.jamiemphoto.com You can't spell awesome without emo...backwards! -Julie definingawesome (11:44:11 PM): Eisley shivers our timbers |
|
|
Joined: 15 Aug 2003 | Posts: 25185 | Location: East Texas
|
|
|
TheAntrider wrote: StallionMang wrote: And the grand prize winner:
On "Telescope Eyes" (original): this version of the song is horrible. i can't believe they said 'you freak'. the new version is so much better. I think the loss of "freak" was terrible, but this just goes to show you that it's about perspective. If you heard Room Noises first, you could quite possibly prefer those versions. And, actually, I do agree that the Laughing City EP TE is as close to terrible as Eisley has gotten ... ha. Though the original (demo/EP2) version was not too bad. Yeah I heard the Room Noises version first and I definitely don't prefer it. The first time I heard Eisley was when I saw them live, and I absolutely loved them, but Telescope Eyes stood out to me as my least favorite song they played all night. I really like the EP2 version though, I wish they kept something similar to it. _________________ Hi, my name is Jenna.
|
|
|
Joined: 30 May 2005 | Posts: 687 | Location: Los Angeles
|
|
|
TheAntrider wrote: StallionMang wrote: And the grand prize winner:
On "Telescope Eyes" (original): this version of the song is horrible. i can't believe they said 'you freak'. the new version is so much better. I think the loss of "freak" was terrible, but this just goes to show you that it's about perspective. If you heard Room Noises first, you could quite possibly prefer those versions. And, actually, I do agree that the Laughing City EP TE is as close to terrible as Eisley has gotten ... ha. Though the original (demo/EP2) version was not too bad. I think "you freak" definitely suits the theme. The whole second verse from the earlier versions was also quite good. _________________
|
|
|
Joined: 20 Feb 2006 | Posts: 1275 | Location: Ontario, Canada
|
|
|
OceanMachine wrote: TheAntrider wrote: StallionMang wrote: And the grand prize winner:
On "Telescope Eyes" (original): this version of the song is horrible. i can't believe they said 'you freak'. the new version is so much better. I think the loss of "freak" was terrible, but this just goes to show you that it's about perspective. If you heard Room Noises first, you could quite possibly prefer those versions. And, actually, I do agree that the Laughing City EP TE is as close to terrible as Eisley has gotten ... ha. Though the original (demo/EP2) version was not too bad. I think "you freak" definitely suits the theme. The whole second verse from the earlier versions was also quite good. I agree, "you see" makes the meaning of the song more ambiguous. _________________ Hi, my name is Jenna.
|
|
|
Joined: 30 May 2005 | Posts: 687 | Location: Los Angeles
|
|
|
dannychair wrote: OceanMachine wrote: TheAntrider wrote: StallionMang wrote: And the grand prize winner:
On "Telescope Eyes" (original): this version of the song is horrible. i can't believe they said 'you freak'. the new version is so much better. I think the loss of "freak" was terrible, but this just goes to show you that it's about perspective. If you heard Room Noises first, you could quite possibly prefer those versions. And, actually, I do agree that the Laughing City EP TE is as close to terrible as Eisley has gotten ... ha. Though the original (demo/EP2) version was not too bad. I think "you freak" definitely suits the theme. The whole second verse from the earlier versions was also quite good. I agree, "you see" makes the meaning of the song more ambiguous. Not sure we're talking about the same thing here. I was referring to the verse which begins, "Go cry, go run away". _________________
|
|
|
Joined: 20 Feb 2006 | Posts: 1275 | Location: Ontario, Canada
|
|
|
TheAntrider wrote: gregorydymitrowicz wrote: TheAntrider wrote: StallionMang wrote: And the grand prize winner:
On "Telescope Eyes" (original): this version of the song is horrible. i can't believe they said 'you freak'. the new version is so much better. I think the loss of "freak" was terrible, but this just goes to show you that it's about perspective. If you heard Room Noises first, you could quite possibly prefer those versions. And, actually, I do agree that the Laughing City EP TE is as close to terrible as Eisley has gotten ... ha. Though the original (demo/EP2) version was not too bad. I thought you were going to bed? ....I looked up to you, man. But now...I just don't know anymore. Ha. I spent almost 4 hours attempting to. I had to take a breather from caffeine-induced tossing and turning. Ok, I'll believe you. This time. |
|
|
Joined: 11 Aug 2005 | Posts: 3181 |
|
|
|
OceanMachine wrote: dannychair wrote: OceanMachine wrote: TheAntrider wrote: StallionMang wrote: And the grand prize winner:
On "Telescope Eyes" (original): this version of the song is horrible. i can't believe they said 'you freak'. the new version is so much better. I think the loss of "freak" was terrible, but this just goes to show you that it's about perspective. If you heard Room Noises first, you could quite possibly prefer those versions. And, actually, I do agree that the Laughing City EP TE is as close to terrible as Eisley has gotten ... ha. Though the original (demo/EP2) version was not too bad. I think "you freak" definitely suits the theme. The whole second verse from the earlier versions was also quite good. I agree, "you see" makes the meaning of the song more ambiguous. Not sure we're talking about the same thing here. I was referring to the verse which begins, "Go cry, go run away". They say "you freak" in the second verse too? _________________ Hi, my name is Jenna.
|
|
|
Joined: 30 May 2005 | Posts: 687 | Location: Los Angeles
|
|
|
dannychair wrote: OceanMachine wrote: dannychair wrote: OceanMachine wrote: TheAntrider wrote: StallionMang wrote: And the grand prize winner:
On "Telescope Eyes" (original): this version of the song is horrible. i can't believe they said 'you freak'. the new version is so much better. I think the loss of "freak" was terrible, but this just goes to show you that it's about perspective. If you heard Room Noises first, you could quite possibly prefer those versions. And, actually, I do agree that the Laughing City EP TE is as close to terrible as Eisley has gotten ... ha. Though the original (demo/EP2) version was not too bad. I think "you freak" definitely suits the theme. The whole second verse from the earlier versions was also quite good. I agree, "you see" makes the meaning of the song more ambiguous. Not sure we're talking about the same thing here. I was referring to the verse which begins, "Go cry, go run away". They say "you freak" in the second verse too? No. I was just stringing together the two comments: [1] that I thought "you freak" (in the first verse) was suitable, and [2] that I thought the whole second verse (which begins with the line, "Go cry, go run away") also contains some good lyrics. _________________
|
|
|
Joined: 20 Feb 2006 | Posts: 1275 | Location: Ontario, Canada
|
|
|
Joined: 26 Apr 2005 | Posts: 1597 | Location: Toronto, Ontario. Canada
|
|
|
StallionMang wrote: On "Trolleywood": Sherri DuPree is a fan of Ray Bradbury, so it may have something to do with Dandelion Wine. It makes a lot of sense that it could be about D.W. I always assumed it was related to Dandelion Wine. It's an amazing book. _________________ But for now we are young Let us lay in the sun And count every beautiful thing we can see |
|
|
Joined: 06 Apr 2006 | Posts: 87 | Location: The Woodlands, Texas
|
|
|
|
|
|
Laughing City Forum Index -> eisleyBlog -> song meanings
Page 1 of 2 goto page | next >>
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |
|
|
All times are GMT - 12 Hours
|
|



