|
<< prev | goto page
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Author | Message | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 Post subject: Posted: Mon Sep 10, 2007 10:31 am 
TheAntrider wrote: Kinnie wrote: I like the second one, it's more interesting. I was going to pick it, too, but I didn't like the ring part as much. Whatever that's called. The ring? And then the stones? I dunno, I'm not good with jewelry. ha. The shank.  I'm better with gems and cuts than the actual jewelry itself.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Joined: 12 Jun 2005 | Posts: 20735 |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
  |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Post subject: Posted: Mon Sep 10, 2007 10:37 am
patrock wrote: TheAntrider wrote: Kinnie wrote: I like the second one, it's more interesting. I was going to pick it, too, but I didn't like the ring part as much. Whatever that's called. The ring? And then the stones? I dunno, I'm not good with jewelry. ha. The shank. I'm better with gems and cuts than the actual jewelry itself.I thought it was just called the band? Whatever, I wouldn't know. Anyhow, I think the second one is more stellar. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Joined: 21 May 2005 | Posts: 5051 | Location: TX/NYC
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
  |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Post subject: Posted: Mon Sep 10, 2007 10:38 am
patrock wrote: Saellys wrote: Is there a choice that's not potentially soaked in the blood of Rwandans?
No? The first one, then. Those are cubic zirconia, Hannah. $14.99 and $19.99! ... Well, so much for starting an awesome anti-diamond debate in this thread.  _________________ INTELLECT AND ROMANCE OVER BRUTE FORCE AND CYNICISM Smokemonster |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Joined: 24 Sep 2003 | Posts: 14510 | Location: Alone on an airplane, fallin' asleep against the windowpane...
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Post subject: Posted: Mon Sep 10, 2007 10:53 am
blang blanggin'. i vote number 2 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Joined: 24 Jul 2005 | Posts: 1963 |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Post subject: Posted: Mon Sep 10, 2007 10:55 am
#1 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Joined: 17 Dec 2005 | Posts: 7525 | Location: Wisconsin
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Post subject: Posted: Mon Sep 10, 2007 11:04 am
vivalaspopie wrote: patrock wrote: TheAntrider wrote: Kinnie wrote: I like the second one, it's more interesting. I was going to pick it, too, but I didn't like the ring part as much. Whatever that's called. The ring? And then the stones? I dunno, I'm not good with jewelry. ha. The shank. I'm better with gems and cuts than the actual jewelry itself.I thought it was just called the band? Whatever, I wouldn't know. THE PARTS OF A RING Shank: The band portion of the ring, which encircles the finger Claw: The tiny 'point' that, with others, holds a stone securely in place Hallmark: A guarantee of authenticity, stamped on precious metal after it has been independently tested; Assay mark, Gold standard mark (in carats), Date mark, Maker's mark. Boodles also hand engrave their rings: BOODLES. 
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Joined: 12 Jun 2005 | Posts: 20735 |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Post subject: Posted: Mon Sep 10, 2007 12:00 pm
i chose the second — but i know absolutely nothing about jewelry; i just think it looks prettier… |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Joined: 23 Mar 2006 | Posts: 1126 | Location: Temple Terrace, Florida
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Post subject: Posted: Mon Sep 10, 2007 12:48 pm
the first one...it's more classy looking _________________ 
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Joined: 25 Jul 2007 | Posts: 275 | Location: so cal
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Post subject: Posted: Mon Sep 10, 2007 12:51 pm
Might I suggest the following: 
 _________________ Audioscrobbler Now 
This is MYSPACE Gee, Blog |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Joined: 29 Oct 2003 | Posts: 4250 | Location: Up here in Connecticut
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
  |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Post subject: Posted: Mon Sep 10, 2007 3:29 pm
patrock wrote: Saellys wrote: Is there a choice that's not potentially soaked in the blood of Rwandans?
No? The first one, then. Those are cubic zirconia, Hannah. $14.99 and $19.99! YAY JTV PRICES!!! I like the shoulders of the first one better, but it looks like the second one would look cooler from the side, and I'm a sucker for that. Either way I won't regret it, but it's a hard decision because I'm picky and indecisive. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Joined: 28 Jul 2005 | Posts: 4455 | Location: Sacramento, CA.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Post subject: Posted: Mon Sep 10, 2007 3:44 pm
Paranoid Android v2.0 wrote: Might I suggest the following:
hahaha, the green lantern, i would so buy that if i had the money and was chosen to be the next green lantern... _________________ cynlovescandy wrote: kulvir wrote: I bet R. Kelly approves of peeing in the shower. The world is R. Kelly's shower. It's a golden world. Nowhere Man wrote: mr pine wrote: is there a difference between dubstep and techno?
you know besides the name? techno: uhnd chik uhnd chik uhnd chik uhnd chik dubstep: BOOM Chik.. Boom Boom Boom Chik.. PEOOOWWwwww BOOM BOWowoWOWoWOWow zipzipzipzipzipwoowooowoow EEEEEeeeeeerrr BOOM BOOM BOOM Splat! |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Joined: 02 Mar 2006 | Posts: 2522 | Location: Kansas
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Laughing City Forum Index -> General -> Help me pick a ring!
Page 2 of 2 << prev | goto page
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
All times are GMT - 12 Hours
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
