|
|
Author | Message |
---|---|
Joined: 17 Dec 2005 | Posts: 7525 | Location: Wisconsin
|
|
Joined: 05 Oct 2007 | Posts: 572 | Location: Southern California
|
|
CUBSWINWORLDSERIES wrote: The more the label pigeonholes Eisley to fit a perceived demographic, the more they do them a disservice, IMO. This version is lovely. Thank you. Wait though, it's still not clear (to me at least) if this version is the re-write the label wanted or if the one on Room Noises is the re-write. _________________ we're really not alone, we have each other |
|
Joined: 13 Jan 2007 | Posts: 2600 | Location: sitting in his nowhere land, TX
|
|
i've wanted to get the bridge to this version tattooed on my inner arm for a long while now. this version is by far superior to the other. i'm utterly in love with it. i was gonna post something about it a while ago, but decided against is. Nowhere Man wrote: CUBSWINWORLDSERIES wrote: The more the label pigeonholes Eisley to fit a perceived demographic, the more they do them a disservice, IMO. This version is lovely. Thank you. Wait though, it's still not clear (to me at least) if this version is the re-write the label wanted or if the one on Room Noises is the re-write. the RN version is the re-write. this version is just a demo, and it's still better. _________________ cynlovescandy wrote: kulvir wrote: I bet R. Kelly approves of peeing in the shower. The world is R. Kelly's shower. It's a golden world. Nowhere Man wrote: mr pine wrote: is there a difference between dubstep and techno?
you know besides the name? techno: uhnd chik uhnd chik uhnd chik uhnd chik dubstep: BOOM Chik.. Boom Boom Boom Chik.. PEOOOWWwwww BOOM BOWowoWOWoWOWow zipzipzipzipzipwoowooowoow EEEEEeeeeeerrr BOOM BOOM BOOM Splat! |
|
Joined: 02 Mar 2006 | Posts: 2522 | Location: Kansas
|
|
How have I never even heard of this? I am totally blown away- I have to say this version really trumps the albums' version. "If I were older, faster, somehow sensibly sure Would I be prone to not be immature?" I love that lyric. _________________ "The artist, like the God of creation, remains within or behind or beyond or above his handiwork, invisible, refined out of existence, indifferent, paring his fingernails."(J.Joyce) |
|
Joined: 18 Dec 2004 | Posts: 339 | Location: never give up and good luck will find you.
|
|
This is the first time I ever heard this demo... and Brightly Wound is one of my favorite songs by them -- I'm actually thinking about getting "I shall never grow up, make believe is much too fun" tattooed on my forearm. I must admit that lyrically that the demo is superior. But at the same time, I love the RN version to death because it just makes me smile. _________________ "I cannot discuss your verses; for any attempt at criticism would be foreign to me. Nothing touches a work of art so little as words of criticism." -- Rainer Maria Rilke |
|
Joined: 19 Nov 2005 | Posts: 1045 | Location: Mansfield and Austin
|
|
I've had this version for a long while but never realized it until several months ago. the sound quality of that youtube one isn't very good, though. youtube really likes to ruin sound quality I've noticed... _________________ |
|
Joined: 30 Aug 2007 | Posts: 431 | Location: Tex-Ass
|
|
I like the lyrics in the old version better, but I like the arrangement much better for the Room Noises version, especially the "We were walking there/I was just wishing you were here" part. That's got to be my favorite part of any Eisley song... ever. _________________ way out of here |
|
Joined: 25 Jul 2007 | Posts: 40 | Location: Seattle
|
|
Oh I've heard it before! I listened to it like 10 times in a row the first time I heard it lol. What I liked most was the old pics that were in the video. It warms a part of my heart to see old Eisley pics...but to see them with an old recording of an awesome Eisley song is wolverine. I know some of the pics aren't that pics though. |
|
Joined: 28 Dec 2007 | Posts: 807 | Location: Wouldn't you like to know?
|
|
Joined: 05 Nov 2007 | Posts: 1453 | Location: Orlando, Florida
|
|
oh and I find it funny that a picture of me with the band is in that video... ahaha. _________________ |
|
Joined: 30 Aug 2007 | Posts: 431 | Location: Tex-Ass
|
|
CUBSWINWORLDSERIES wrote: The more the label pigeonholes Eisley to fit a perceived demographic, the more they do them a disservice, IMO. This version is lovely. Thank you. +1 No. +100,000 You nutshelled the whole problem very incisively. as for that version of the song- I'm not sure if I've heard it before- If so I don't remember it (I saw them pre-'05, but I wasn't really a fan at the time - OK- to be honest, I'd never heard of them before-it was totally random, so I didn't know any of their songs- I really liked the show though); BUT Wow. That's really nice. If that had been the released version, I wouldn't have hated the song! All this time, when people have been posting that Brightly Wound is their favourite Eisley song, I've totally missed the appeal. I found the RN version so annoyingly insipid that I cut it out and re-burned the CD! If this is the version they meant, though, I get it. Amazing how the same song can be so different. I especially like the vocal arrangements right at the beginning, and the slower tempo, It has that driving intensity and poignance that I love about eisley but was so missing in the album version. I still don't think its going to be my favourite Eisley song, necessarily, but the difference is amazing. I do like it much better Eisley should DEFINITELY be self-producing. Or at least get to the point (in both leverage and confidence) to stand by their instincts, which are better than those of pretty much anyone else around, from what I've heard. Even subtle differences in tempo make all the difference. I think Eisley are the only ones who are really going to be able to nail "Eisley". . I hope they get to the point that they feel like they can resurrect it live, if this is how it was supposed to sound. The old Brighly Wound AND the original Telescope Eyes Mooncutter wrote: WB felt the song had the potential to be a solid radio tune, and wanted to release it as the second single. The sad irony is, now that I hear this version, if they'd left it alone and had some faith in their artist, it very well might have been! |
|
Joined: 06 Jan 2008 | Posts: 1759 | Location: Dallas
Last edited by inorbit on Wed Oct 01, 2008 11:42 am; edited 14 times in total |
|
Joined: 28 Jun 2005 | Posts: 2574 |
|
|
Joined: 22 Feb 2008 | Posts: 666 | Location: Maryland
|
|
Joined: 05 Oct 2007 | Posts: 572 | Location: Southern California
|
|
|
|
Laughing City Forum Index -> eisleyBlog -> Old Brightly Wound?
Page 2 of 6 |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |
|
All times are GMT - 12 Hours
|