goto page | next >>
|
|
Author | Message |
---|---|
Nice cover, =) bLackeNedcrowN wrote: chords? I wrote out the chords for Teddy one day, the original key is Bb. This is the conversation that ensued (sorry, to lazy to put them to lyrics, =P) Quote: fatherteddyo (1:08:38 PM): so tencentblues.
fatherteddyo (1:08:41 PM): Bb... fatherteddyo (1:08:47 PM): and that's all i remember. DRMS 7888 (1:09:00 PM): up DRMS 7888 (1:09:13 PM): it was I, ii, IV, ii, IV DRMS 7888 (1:09:15 PM): so DRMS 7888 (1:09:22 PM): Bb DRMS 7888 (1:09:23 PM): Cm DRMS 7888 (1:09:28 PM): Eb DRMS 7888 (1:09:29 PM): Cm DRMS 7888 (1:09:31 PM): Eb fatherteddyo (1:28:47 PM): hmm. DRMS 7888 (1:29:01 PM): hmmmmmmm fatherteddyo (1:29:15 PM): i feel like there are more chords than that. DRMS 7888 (1:29:37 PM): there's maybe a V DRMS 7888 (1:29:50 PM): but the progression isn't always I ii IV ii IV fatherteddyo (1:29:48 PM): THE CHORDS DO NOT GO TO V fatherteddyo (1:29:50 PM): GAH!! fatherteddyo (1:29:53 PM): they go to G. DRMS 7888 (1:31:18 PM): it's 2 measures of Bb DRMS 7888 (1:31:41 PM): 2 measures Cm DRMS 7888 (1:31:52 PM): 1 measure of Eb, 1 measure of Cm DRMS 7888 (1:31:58 PM): 2 measures of Eb DRMS 7888 (1:32:01 PM): that's the opening DRMS 7888 (1:33:35 PM): does that make sense? fatherteddyo (1:33:38 PM): yes DRMS 7888 (1:35:12 PM): and the next part is 1 measure of Eb DRMS 7888 (1:35:31 PM): "and my stilts DRMS 7888 (1:35:38 PM): 1 measure of Cm DRMS 7888 (1:35:43 PM): and then 2 more of Eb DRMS 7888 (1:36:06 PM): then back to the original progression fatherteddyo (1:36:05 PM): there we go fatherteddyo (1:36:44 PM): what about the bridge? DRMS 7888 (1:37:52 PM): It's Bb and then either Cm or Eb DRMS 7888 (1:37:54 PM): probably Cm DRMS 7888 (1:38:05 PM): don't have a piano in front of me _________________ EisleyForever wrote: you're A-list in my heart! MAKECOLDPLAYHISTORY |
|
Joined: 20 Feb 2005 | Posts: 8868 | Location: Saturn, the Bringer of Old Age
|
|
Joined: 29 Oct 2005 | Posts: 293 | Location: Pennsylvania
|
|
Joined: 01 May 2005 | Posts: 67 | Location: Palo Alto, California
|
|
Joined: 10 Feb 2007 | Posts: 2907 | Location: Maryland
|
|
Joined: 28 Jan 2005 | Posts: 1813 |
|
|
Joined: 04 Mar 2004 | Posts: 11753 | Location: Toledo, OR
|
|
Joined: 20 Feb 2005 | Posts: 8868 | Location: Saturn, the Bringer of Old Age
|
|
A with capo on first fret. Or barre chords, which aren't really that hard, are they? It's a good gospel key. Yum. _________________ Scriptozoology, a screenwriting blog .. Facebook |
|
Joined: 04 Mar 2004 | Posts: 11753 | Location: Toledo, OR
|
|
Let me think... Bb Cm Dm Eb F Gm Adim I guess it's just that pretty much all of those are barre chords (save Dm). I generally like to play open chords if possible (for stylistic reasons.) I play all those chords barred, but transitions aren't nearly as smooth either. Then again, I never really "practice" the guitar so I don't have much to complain about. EDIT: I should state, I like barre chords with a E fingering (I don't know the proper terminology), but the ones with A fingering are nasty for my large fingers. _________________ EisleyForever wrote: you're A-list in my heart! MAKECOLDPLAYHISTORY |
|
Joined: 20 Feb 2005 | Posts: 8868 | Location: Saturn, the Bringer of Old Age
|
|
You can play Dm, F, Gm, and Adim open. The E-style barre chord is the easier one, but I've never really had a problem with the A-style. My brother and my dad think I'm a freak because I can bend my ring finger so that it doesn't touch the high E, so maybe I'm just the right kind of flexible. _________________ Scriptozoology, a screenwriting blog .. Facebook |
|
Joined: 04 Mar 2004 | Posts: 11753 | Location: Toledo, OR
|
|
Joined: 15 Aug 2003 | Posts: 25184 | Location: East Texas
|
|
OMG IT DOES NOT GO TO V *SRSLY HAS AN EXISTENTIAL CRISIS* its I ii IV ii IV. does this mean that it doesn't work according to the classic rules of theory? I really don't get the classic rules of theory much - i mean, parallel fifths and octaves are pretty much accepted these days. |
|
Joined: 08 Jul 2007 | Posts: 671 | Location: Laughing City
|
|
Joined: 20 Feb 2005 | Posts: 8868 | Location: Saturn, the Bringer of Old Age
|
|
ZenArtist wrote: OMG IT DOES NOT GO TO V
*SRSLY HAS AN EXISTENTIAL CRISIS* its I ii IV ii IV. does this mean that it doesn't work according to the classic rules of theory? I really don't get the classic rules of theory much - i mean, parallel fifths and octaves are pretty much accepted these days. OMG WTF WHERS LEADING TONE? K THKNXBI It's not a very common progression in terms of early classical (IE- Bach), but everybody and their mother has been breaking his rules for a few hundred years. I enjoy it, it has a very continuous sound to the progression (which works well for the narrative style of the lyric.) It's not so much that they are rules you can't break, but rules you shouldn't break if you wish to write in that style. Sort of like the modern pop formula: Verse/chorus/verse/chorus/bridge/chorus You certainly don't have to follow that skeleton, but that's what most of pop songs are. _________________ EisleyForever wrote: you're A-list in my heart! MAKECOLDPLAYHISTORY |
|
Joined: 20 Feb 2005 | Posts: 8868 | Location: Saturn, the Bringer of Old Age
|
|
Joined: 05 Nov 2007 | Posts: 1453 | Location: Orlando, Florida
|
|
|
|
Laughing City Forum Index -> eisleyBlog -> I made a new Eisley Cover-
Page 1 of 2 goto page | next >>
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |
|
All times are GMT - 12 Hours
|