|
|
Author | Message |
---|---|
Joined: 21 May 2005 | Posts: 5051 | Location: TX/NYC
|
|
Joined: 23 Aug 2004 | Posts: 2041 | Location: Seattle
|
|
Joined: 01 Jan 2005 | Posts: 2930 | Location: Cali
|
|
It's supposed to be a play on words, I think. You think it's cry, then it turns into crying out. Tricky. A tougher one is Ozma's "Eponine." The first chorus is "Woah, my Eponine," but the second chorus segues from the first verse with "Time to put an end to all your woe, my Eponine." Clever. _________________ Scriptozoology, a screenwriting blog .. Facebook |
|
Joined: 04 Mar 2004 | Posts: 11753 | Location: Toledo, OR
|
|
cryptictonight wrote: Okay, so we all by now know it's brightly "wow-ned" (and not woond). Forgive my ignorance, but care to elaborate? I did, however, notice the "cry = say" bit. And did anyone notice that BW's the only track on the CD where the title isn't actually a part of the lyrics? Me neither, 'til further examination. |
|
Joined: 17 Aug 2005 | Posts: 196 |
|
|
I didn't know there was a pronunciation issue with the song. I mean, "Brightly" is an adverb, which would make "Wound" a verb, not a noun. Should there really even be a question? _________________ Scriptozoology, a screenwriting blog .. Facebook |
|
Joined: 04 Mar 2004 | Posts: 11753 | Location: Toledo, OR
|
|
Joined: 17 Aug 2005 | Posts: 196 |
|
|
boone wrote: I didn't know there was a pronunciation issue with the song. I mean, "Brightly" is an adverb, which would make "Wound" a verb, not a noun. Should there really even be a question? to wound (woond) is a verb. just thought i would point that out. even though i am positive that it is brightly wound (wow-ned) _________________ |
|
Joined: 21 May 2005 | Posts: 5051 | Location: TX/NYC
|
|
boone wrote: I didn't know there was a pronunciation issue with the song. I mean, "Brightly" is an adverb, which would make "Wound" a verb, not a noun. Should there really even be a question? since when does Eisley pay close attention to grammar? or any rock band for that matter... _________________ welcome to the no pants club boone |
|
Joined: 18 Mar 2004 | Posts: 8693 |
|
|
granpaturtle wrote: since when does Eisley pay close attention to grammar? or any rock band for that matter... So, which one's correct, anyways? "Lost at sea, you and me" or "lost at sea, you and I"? I'm inclined to think the latter, as "I (am) lost at sea" sounds more correct than "Me (am) lost at sea". I guess it isn't such a bad idea to cover both . |
|
Joined: 17 Aug 2005 | Posts: 196 |
|
|
vivalaspopie wrote: boone wrote: I didn't know there was a pronunciation issue with the song. I mean, "Brightly" is an adverb, which would make "Wound" a verb, not a noun. Should there really even be a question? to wound (woond) is a verb. just thought i would point that out. even though i am positive that it is brightly wound (wow-ned) It requires a perfect tense, using a past participle. It would be Brightly Wounded. Wound is past tense of wind. "To wound" is based on "a wound," which is a noun, by the way. granpaturtle wrote: since when does Eisley pay close attention to grammar? or any rock band for that matter... Since always. Durr. UberDrive wrote: So, which one's correct, anyways? "Lost at sea, you and me" or "lost at sea, you and I"? I'm inclined to think the latter, as "I (am) lost at sea" sounds more correct than "Me (am) lost at sea". I guess it isn't such a bad idea to cover both . You are right. "You and I are lost at sea." But "You and I, you and me" makes it rhyme. _________________ Scriptozoology, a screenwriting blog .. Facebook |
|
Joined: 04 Mar 2004 | Posts: 11753 | Location: Toledo, OR
|
|
boone wrote: vivalaspopie wrote: boone wrote: I didn't know there was a pronunciation issue with the song. I mean, "Brightly" is an adverb, which would make "Wound" a verb, not a noun. Should there really even be a question? to wound (woond) is a verb. just thought i would point that out. even though i am positive that it is brightly wound (wow-ned) It requires a perfect tense, using a past participle. It would be Brightly Wounded. Wound is past tense of wind. "To wound" is based on "a wound," which is a noun, by the way. That's why I have an A in Latin. _________________ Power is only pain It’s probably better to have him inside the tent pissing out, than outside the tent pissing in. "Can we get control of an individual to the point where he will do our bidding against his will and even against fundamental laws of nature, such as self preservation?" -memo from 1952 Project ARTICHOKE |
|
Joined: 19 Aug 2004 | Posts: 10565 | Location: Somewhere in the middle of nowhere
|
|
Joined: 11 Feb 2005 | Posts: 217 |
|
|
amestheamazing wrote: I have another lyrics-related question, but I don't feel like starting a new thread..
In Golly Sandra, does she sing "you are my star" or "you are my scar"? I've seen it printed as both. i think star makes more sense with the song, but im not positive. _________________ |
|
Joined: 21 May 2005 | Posts: 5051 | Location: TX/NYC
|
|
It says "scar" in the booklet. _________________ Power is only pain It’s probably better to have him inside the tent pissing out, than outside the tent pissing in. "Can we get control of an individual to the point where he will do our bidding against his will and even against fundamental laws of nature, such as self preservation?" -memo from 1952 Project ARTICHOKE |
|
Joined: 19 Aug 2004 | Posts: 10565 | Location: Somewhere in the middle of nowhere
|
|
|
|
Laughing City Forum Index -> eisleyBlog -> Brightly Wound Debate
Page 2 of 3 |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |
|
All times are GMT - 12 Hours
|