Laughing City
Author Message
kuhlmun
Golly, Poster


Wikipedia is a perfecly fine source to use as long as you check it with another source (now I ponder if maybe that defeats the purpose of going there in the first place...)

boone wrote:

As for being a credible source of information, I wouldn't quote Wikipedia in a thesis, but I use it all the time for quick reference. I trust it as much as I trust the History Channel. Probably more.


Agreed
Joined: 26 Feb 2006 | Posts: 914 | Location: I'm not here, this isn't happening
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
JBaker
Vintage Newbie


I kinda wanna know what the Sherri quote in Brand New "Untitled 02" is...
Assuming there's truth to that piece of trivia.

_________________
EvilSpace
Joined: 01 Mar 2005 | Posts: 2348 | Location: Plano, TX
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website AIM Address
cryptictonight
Lost at Forum


JBaker wrote:
I kinda wanna know what the Sherri quote in Brand New "Untitled 02" is...
Assuming there's truth to that piece of trivia.


me too... actually.

_________________
-Brooke
Joined: 14 Dec 2004 | Posts: 1141 | Location: Utah/Hawaii
View user's profile Send private message
Grantticus
Golly, Poster


i really doubt that any lines in 'untitled 02' by brand new is about sherri
seeing as they supposidly recorded these songs just after deja

if any,
the sleeping with her fiancé line?

_________________
The Barents Sea
Joined: 08 Jun 2005 | Posts: 806 | Location: Perth, Scotland
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
TheAntrider
Protocol Droid


This is the trouble with rumor. Someone who doesn't even know about that situation beyond the very surface (they dated) offhandedly expressed that thought, and now it's gained some kind of legs via ignorance and the rumor mill. If I had to guess, there's at best only a strenuous relation between those lyrics and real life, and even if there is more: IT IS NONE OF OUR BUSINESS.

Also, I think these songs are older than the engagement. Unless he's gained the ability to read the future, I would think this song predates said event.

Anyway, let's get back to the main topic here.

_________________
My photography:www.jamiemphoto.com

You can't spell awesome without emo...backwards! -Julie
definingawesome (11:44:11 PM): Eisley shivers our timbers
Joined: 15 Aug 2003 | Posts: 25185 | Location: East Texas
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address
Miss Pine
Golly, Poster


Yeah Wikipedia is not very reliable. I was the one who made Sherri's page originally, but it's been changed a lot since. You can't always tell what is and isn't true.
Joined: 13 Feb 2006 | Posts: 985 | Location: Canada
View user's profile Send private message
Connie
Golly, Poster


Grantticus wrote:
i really doubt that any lines in 'untitled 02' by brand new is about sherri
seeing as they supposidly recorded these songs just after deja

if any,
the sleeping with her fiancé line?


That could be it because I looked for the line and that's the only thing I thought it could be.

Ehh who cares.

_________________
Joined: 05 Aug 2005 | Posts: 527 | Location: San Jose, California
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website AIM Address
Pantheon4
Vintage Newbie


I think it was some role-player took off the part in the trivia section that says that Sherri doesn't like to be portrayed in online role-playing communities. Just because you don't want something to be true doesn't mean it isn't. Confused
_________________
Power is only pain

It’s probably better to have him inside the tent pissing out, than outside the tent pissing in.

"Can we get control of an individual to the point where he will do our bidding against his will and even against fundamental laws of nature, such as self preservation?" -memo from 1952 Project ARTICHOKE

Joined: 19 Aug 2004 | Posts: 10565 | Location: Somewhere in the middle of nowhere
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
Dat
Golly, Poster


Miss Pine wrote:
Yeah Wikipedia is not very reliable. I was the one who made Sherri's page originally, but it's been changed a lot since. You can't always tell what is and isn't true.


Yeah it sucks especially when the common public opinion is completely wrong. And when the people who know the real truth go through the trouble of making corrections, those corrections get messed up again by more idiots.

_________________
"I can't wait until I'm old enough to feel ways about stuff." -Fry
-
Xanga - Flickr
Joined: 15 Jun 2005 | Posts: 578 | Location: San Francisco, CA
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website AIM Address
gallowspole74
Sea Post King


Simonthegreat wrote:
Well I learned something. I never knew they sang on the Head Automatica album, and I own it. So I went through it looking for their names and found under the people they thank 'Staci and Sheri'. They misspelt both their names.


They sang on the Head Automatica album? Hmm, I thought they were Christians, and I wouldn't consider it to be very church appropriate...
Joined: 01 Apr 2005 | Posts: 46 | 
View user's profile Send private message
LeslieAnnLevine
Lost at Forum


gallowspole74 wrote:
Simonthegreat wrote:
Well I learned something. I never knew they sang on the Head Automatica album, and I own it. So I went through it looking for their names and found under the people they thank 'Staci and Sheri'. They misspelt both their names.


They sang on the Head Automatica album? Hmm, I thought they were Christians, and I wouldn't consider it to be very church appropriate...
I don't think they are those type of Christians. It was just some vox on a song, no big deal, and nothing un-Godly about it, imo.
Joined: 19 Apr 2004 | Posts: 1219 | Location: here, there, everywhere.
View user's profile Send private message
gallowspole74
Sea Post King


LeslieAnnLevine wrote:
gallowspole74 wrote:
Simonthegreat wrote:
Well I learned something. I never knew they sang on the Head Automatica album, and I own it. So I went through it looking for their names and found under the people they thank 'Staci and Sheri'. They misspelt both their names.


They sang on the Head Automatica album? Hmm, I thought they were Christians, and I wouldn't consider it to be very church appropriate...
I don't think they are those type of Christians. It was just some vox on a song, no big deal, and nothing un-Godly about it, imo.


"I want to f@#% you in your God's hands,
When your praying bites the dust.

Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please.
Let me anoint the lust inside you.
Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please.
Let me devalue what's inside you."

Whether or not they even knew this song existed is a good question, as they didn't sing on it. Which one did they sing on? Dance Party Plus?
Joined: 01 Apr 2005 | Posts: 46 | 
View user's profile Send private message
Sabrina
Sea Post King


gallowspole74 wrote:
LeslieAnnLevine wrote:
gallowspole74 wrote:
Simonthegreat wrote:
Well I learned something. I never knew they sang on the Head Automatica album, and I own it. So I went through it looking for their names and found under the people they thank 'Staci and Sheri'. They misspelt both their names.


They sang on the Head Automatica album? Hmm, I thought they were Christians, and I wouldn't consider it to be very church appropriate...
I don't think they are those type of Christians. It was just some vox on a song, no big deal, and nothing un-Godly about it, imo.


"I want to f@#% you in your God's hands,
When your praying bites the dust.

Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please.
Let me anoint the lust inside you.
Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please.
Let me devalue what's inside you."

Whether or not they even knew this song existed is a good question, as they didn't sing on it. Which one did they sing on? Dance Party Plus?

yes they sang on dance party plus, there is a version with their vocals and a version with out.

and because they are christians it doesn't mean they have to dislike everyone/everything that goes against THEIR beliefs. and i seriously doubt they even knew about that song or cared much if they did.
Joined: 19 Sep 2004 | Posts: 273 | Location: new york
View user's profile Send private message
Pantheon4
Vintage Newbie


This Rock and Roll music will corupt our youth!!!
_________________
Power is only pain

It’s probably better to have him inside the tent pissing out, than outside the tent pissing in.

"Can we get control of an individual to the point where he will do our bidding against his will and even against fundamental laws of nature, such as self preservation?" -memo from 1952 Project ARTICHOKE

Joined: 19 Aug 2004 | Posts: 10565 | Location: Somewhere in the middle of nowhere
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
Miss Pine
Golly, Poster


Sabrina wrote:
gallowspole74 wrote:
LeslieAnnLevine wrote:
gallowspole74 wrote:
Simonthegreat wrote:
Well I learned something. I never knew they sang on the Head Automatica album, and I own it. So I went through it looking for their names and found under the people they thank 'Staci and Sheri'. They misspelt both their names.


They sang on the Head Automatica album? Hmm, I thought they were Christians, and I wouldn't consider it to be very church appropriate...
I don't think they are those type of Christians. It was just some vox on a song, no big deal, and nothing un-Godly about it, imo.


"I want to f@#% you in your God's hands,
When your praying bites the dust.

Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please.
Let me anoint the lust inside you.
Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please.
Let me devalue what's inside you."

Whether or not they even knew this song existed is a good question, as they didn't sing on it. Which one did they sing on? Dance Party Plus?

yes they sang on dance party plus, there is a version with their vocals and a version with out.

and because they are christians it doesn't mean they have to dislike everyone/everything that goes against THEIR beliefs. and i seriously doubt they even knew about that song or cared much if they did.


Exactly. It's really not a big deal.
Joined: 13 Feb 2006 | Posts: 985 | Location: Canada
View user's profile Send private message
Post new topic   Reply to topic

Display posts from previous:   

<< prev | goto page
 | next >>


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
All times are GMT - 12 Hours
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB, coffee, and Eisley fans worldwide.
phpBB is © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group