
|
|
|
| Author | Message |
|---|---|
|
Wikipedia is a perfecly fine source to use as long as you check it with another source (now I ponder if maybe that defeats the purpose of going there in the first place...) boone wrote: As for being a credible source of information, I wouldn't quote Wikipedia in a thesis, but I use it all the time for quick reference. I trust it as much as I trust the History Channel. Probably more. Agreed |
|
|
Joined: 26 Feb 2006 | Posts: 914 | Location: I'm not here, this isn't happening
|
|
|
I kinda wanna know what the Sherri quote in Brand New "Untitled 02" is... Assuming there's truth to that piece of trivia. _________________ EvilSpace |
|
|
Joined: 01 Mar 2005 | Posts: 2348 | Location: Plano, TX
|
|
|
Joined: 14 Dec 2004 | Posts: 1141 | Location: Utah/Hawaii
|
|
|
Joined: 08 Jun 2005 | Posts: 806 | Location: Perth, Scotland
|
|
|
This is the trouble with rumor. Someone who doesn't even know about that situation beyond the very surface (they dated) offhandedly expressed that thought, and now it's gained some kind of legs via ignorance and the rumor mill. If I had to guess, there's at best only a strenuous relation between those lyrics and real life, and even if there is more: IT IS NONE OF OUR BUSINESS. Also, I think these songs are older than the engagement. Unless he's gained the ability to read the future, I would think this song predates said event. Anyway, let's get back to the main topic here. _________________ My photography:www.jamiemphoto.com You can't spell awesome without emo...backwards! -Julie definingawesome (11:44:11 PM): Eisley shivers our timbers |
|
|
Joined: 15 Aug 2003 | Posts: 25185 | Location: East Texas
|
|
|
Joined: 13 Feb 2006 | Posts: 985 | Location: Canada
|
|
|
Grantticus wrote: i really doubt that any lines in 'untitled 02' by brand new is about sherri
seeing as they supposidly recorded these songs just after deja if any, the sleeping with her fiancé line? That could be it because I looked for the line and that's the only thing I thought it could be. Ehh who cares. _________________
|
|
|
Joined: 05 Aug 2005 | Posts: 527 | Location: San Jose, California
|
|
|
I think it was some role-player took off the part in the trivia section that says that Sherri doesn't like to be portrayed in online role-playing communities. Just because you don't want something to be true doesn't mean it isn't. _________________ Power is only pain It’s probably better to have him inside the tent pissing out, than outside the tent pissing in. "Can we get control of an individual to the point where he will do our bidding against his will and even against fundamental laws of nature, such as self preservation?" -memo from 1952 Project ARTICHOKE
|
|
|
Joined: 19 Aug 2004 | Posts: 10565 | Location: Somewhere in the middle of nowhere
|
|
|
Miss Pine wrote: Yeah Wikipedia is not very reliable. I was the one who made Sherri's page originally, but it's been changed a lot since. You can't always tell what is and isn't true. Yeah it sucks especially when the common public opinion is completely wrong. And when the people who know the real truth go through the trouble of making corrections, those corrections get messed up again by more idiots. _________________ "I can't wait until I'm old enough to feel ways about stuff." -Fry - Xanga - Flickr |
|
|
Joined: 15 Jun 2005 | Posts: 578 | Location: San Francisco, CA
|
|
|
Simonthegreat wrote: Well I learned something. I never knew they sang on the Head Automatica album, and I own it. So I went through it looking for their names and found under the people they thank 'Staci and Sheri'. They misspelt both their names. They sang on the Head Automatica album? Hmm, I thought they were Christians, and I wouldn't consider it to be very church appropriate... |
|
|
Joined: 01 Apr 2005 | Posts: 46 |
|
|
|
gallowspole74 wrote: Simonthegreat wrote: Well I learned something. I never knew they sang on the Head Automatica album, and I own it. So I went through it looking for their names and found under the people they thank 'Staci and Sheri'. They misspelt both their names. They sang on the Head Automatica album? Hmm, I thought they were Christians, and I wouldn't consider it to be very church appropriate... |
|
|
Joined: 19 Apr 2004 | Posts: 1219 | Location: here, there, everywhere.
|
|
|
LeslieAnnLevine wrote: gallowspole74 wrote: Simonthegreat wrote: Well I learned something. I never knew they sang on the Head Automatica album, and I own it. So I went through it looking for their names and found under the people they thank 'Staci and Sheri'. They misspelt both their names. They sang on the Head Automatica album? Hmm, I thought they were Christians, and I wouldn't consider it to be very church appropriate... "I want to f@#% you in your God's hands, When your praying bites the dust. Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please. Let me anoint the lust inside you. Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please. Let me devalue what's inside you." Whether or not they even knew this song existed is a good question, as they didn't sing on it. Which one did they sing on? Dance Party Plus? |
|
|
Joined: 01 Apr 2005 | Posts: 46 |
|
|
|
gallowspole74 wrote: LeslieAnnLevine wrote: gallowspole74 wrote: Simonthegreat wrote: Well I learned something. I never knew they sang on the Head Automatica album, and I own it. So I went through it looking for their names and found under the people they thank 'Staci and Sheri'. They misspelt both their names. They sang on the Head Automatica album? Hmm, I thought they were Christians, and I wouldn't consider it to be very church appropriate... "I want to f@#% you in your God's hands, When your praying bites the dust. Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please. Let me anoint the lust inside you. Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please. Let me devalue what's inside you." Whether or not they even knew this song existed is a good question, as they didn't sing on it. Which one did they sing on? Dance Party Plus? yes they sang on dance party plus, there is a version with their vocals and a version with out. and because they are christians it doesn't mean they have to dislike everyone/everything that goes against THEIR beliefs. and i seriously doubt they even knew about that song or cared much if they did. |
|
|
Joined: 19 Sep 2004 | Posts: 273 | Location: new york
|
|
|
This Rock and Roll music will corupt our youth!!! _________________ Power is only pain It’s probably better to have him inside the tent pissing out, than outside the tent pissing in. "Can we get control of an individual to the point where he will do our bidding against his will and even against fundamental laws of nature, such as self preservation?" -memo from 1952 Project ARTICHOKE
|
|
|
Joined: 19 Aug 2004 | Posts: 10565 | Location: Somewhere in the middle of nowhere
|
|
|
Sabrina wrote: gallowspole74 wrote: LeslieAnnLevine wrote: gallowspole74 wrote: Simonthegreat wrote: Well I learned something. I never knew they sang on the Head Automatica album, and I own it. So I went through it looking for their names and found under the people they thank 'Staci and Sheri'. They misspelt both their names. They sang on the Head Automatica album? Hmm, I thought they were Christians, and I wouldn't consider it to be very church appropriate... "I want to f@#% you in your God's hands, When your praying bites the dust. Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please. Let me anoint the lust inside you. Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please. Let me devalue what's inside you." Whether or not they even knew this song existed is a good question, as they didn't sing on it. Which one did they sing on? Dance Party Plus? yes they sang on dance party plus, there is a version with their vocals and a version with out. and because they are christians it doesn't mean they have to dislike everyone/everything that goes against THEIR beliefs. and i seriously doubt they even knew about that song or cared much if they did. Exactly. It's really not a big deal. |
|
|
Joined: 13 Feb 2006 | Posts: 985 | Location: Canada
|
|
|
|
|
|
Laughing City Forum Index -> eisleyBlog -> Wikipedia
Page 2 of 3 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |
|
|
All times are GMT - 12 Hours
|
|



