
|
|
|
| Author | Message |
|---|---|
|
Saellys wrote: do not be afraid. wrote: you know The Bridges?... that video Wow. They really want to be an Eisley/The Like hybrid, don't they? I was referring to look more than sound. They've got Chauntelle and Sherri doppelgangers, a male drummer Mystic210 wrote: Man, I thought I was watching the Telescope Eyes video for a minute! Good grief, that's an uncanny resemblance. The lead singer (in that video) is a ringer for Stacy just as much as the Sherri & Chauntelle clones. Guess they decided to throw in a weird-haired girl in place of a Garron clone to keep the lawyers away. The proof is in the pudding though, and those are some awful harmonies. The thinline Teles are the best ones IMO, looking good Todd! That quilted maple is beautiful, what color is the finish gonna be?? Made up your mind Chauntelle? We're on pins & needles here! _________________ http://www.twitter.com/drstrangeblog http://www.last.fm/user/getinline I can't find the time to write my mind the way I want it to read. |
|
|
Joined: 05 Mar 2008 | Posts: 2003 | Location: Iowa
|
|
|
see, now i wish i hadn't even bothered to post that video! they're not really Eisley clones at all — i mean, they didn't decide that they wanted to be born to look like Eisley, did they? and they don't really dress that similar (or, at least, not any more than most “indie” bands), or sound that similar (or, again, not any more than most “indie” bands), or anything… and Eisley isn't really that unique of a band, either! i mean, you can clearly hear a lot of influences in both bands, and some are clearly shared, and others clearly aren't, and… whatever… why am i even defending this band? when i posted that video i barely even knew anything about them! it's not like i'm a huge fan, or anything, it's just that i think it's ridiculous to say that they're an Eisley knock-off just because they're a female-fronted family band playing “indie” pop/rock/whatever, which is about the only real similarity that's there! |
|
|
Joined: 23 Mar 2006 | Posts: 1126 | Location: Temple Terrace, Florida
|
|
|
do not be afraid. wrote: see, now i wish i hadn't even bothered to post that video! they're not really Eisley clones at all — i mean, they didn't decide that they wanted to be born to look like Eisley, did they? and they don't really dress that similar (or, at least, not any more than most “indie” bands), or sound that similar (or, again, not any more than most “indie” bands), or anything… and Eisley isn't really that unique of a band, either! i mean, you can clearly hear a lot of influences in both bands, and some are clearly shared, and others clearly aren't, and… whatever… why am i even defending this band? when i posted that video i barely even knew anything about them! it's not like i'm a huge fan, or anything, it's just that i think it's ridiculous to say that they're an Eisley knock-off just because they're a female-fronted family band playing “indie” pop/rock/whatever, which is about the only real similarity that's there! I don't want to perpetuate this argument, but come on.
Second from the left is totally Sherri. Now back to the glory of Telecasters. I lurve mine. _________________ INTELLECT AND ROMANCE OVER BRUTE FORCE AND CYNICISM Smokemonster |
|
|
Joined: 24 Sep 2003 | Posts: 14510 | Location: Alone on an airplane, fallin' asleep against the windowpane...
|
|
|
Joined: 23 Mar 2006 | Posts: 1126 | Location: Temple Terrace, Florida
|
|
|
oh, yeah, back to the Telecasters — here's Emmylou Harris with James Burton, probably my all-time favorite Telecaster player: Shop Around and Jambalaya. but, of course, Chauntelle's will probably end up having “hot” humbuckers, or whatever, and won't sound a damn thing like a Telecaster! that's the way these things always work out… |
|
|
Joined: 23 Mar 2006 | Posts: 1126 | Location: Temple Terrace, Florida
|
|
|
They're probably fine people and the rest of their music might be OK, all I'm saying is that if they or their management have never seen an Eisley video nor heard an Eisley song, then that is truly one of the biggest coincidences since they found a bloody glove on OJ's estate. _________________ http://www.twitter.com/drstrangeblog http://www.last.fm/user/getinline I can't find the time to write my mind the way I want it to read. |
|
|
Joined: 05 Mar 2008 | Posts: 2003 | Location: Iowa
|
|
|
Joined: 23 Mar 2006 | Posts: 1126 | Location: Temple Terrace, Florida
|
|
|
In a few months after their record company has pushed the heck out of the Bridges album, people will be asking Eisley if they patterned themselves after the Bridges. I can't believe that's your new favorite band man. They're ok I guess, that song didn't do anything for me though. _________________
we're really not alone, we have each other |
|
|
Joined: 13 Jan 2007 | Posts: 2600 | Location: sitting in his nowhere land, TX
|
|
|
um, they're not my new favorite band! apart from my crush on the guitar player (who's actually named Stacy, which i'm sure she totally stole from Eisley's Stacy too!), the best thing i can say about them is that their music is pleasant to listen to, reasonably well-crafted, and i'm glad to actually hear a band like this using a Telecaster as a Telecaster (and not just a “cool” and “indie” guitar, that they'll drench in so much distortion that you can't even hear the damn thing [which Chauntelle will probably do too, unfortunately…]) do i even have a “new” favorite band? i honestly haven't heard much new music that really excites me at all these days, and what i have heard has been from bands i've already liked. most of the bands that are getting hyped up a lot now (Hot Chip, MGMT, whatever) don't do anything for me at all! |
|
|
Joined: 23 Mar 2006 | Posts: 1126 | Location: Temple Terrace, Florida
|
|
|
Joined: 11 Nov 2002 | Posts: 3695 | Location: Tyler, TX
|
|
|
wait, i forgot the Telecaster video! here we go: Clarence White with The Byrds! Clarence White is not only a major factor in Telecaster history because of his playing, but also because he invented the B-Bender with Gene Parsons! i think Chauntelle should get a B-Bender on her new Telecaster, but, eh, it's her guitar, and i'm sure she doesn't give the slightest damn what i think! but, yeah, i'm with Kim! i never, ever, meant to start on a discussion on anything other than Chauntelle's new guitar, except, maybe, on Telecasters in general (just because they're so amazingly awesome, and are still actually sort-of on topic!) |
|
|
Joined: 23 Mar 2006 | Posts: 1126 | Location: Temple Terrace, Florida
|
|
|
do not be afraid. wrote: ....
but, yeah, i'm with Kim! i never, ever, meant to start on a discussion on anything other than Chauntelle's new guitar, except, maybe, on Telecasters in general (just because they're so amazingly awesome, and are still actually sort-of on topic!) yeah...no harm. Hopefully Todd will have new shots soon. I'm sure he appreciates all the input. |
|
|
Joined: 11 Nov 2002 | Posts: 3695 | Location: Tyler, TX
|
|
|
do not be afraid. wrote: i'm glad to actually hear a band like this using a Telecaster as a Telecaster (and not just a “cool” and “indie” guitar, that they'll drench in so much distortion that you can't even hear the damn thing [which Chauntelle will probably do too, unfortunately…])
! I love Chauntelle's love of feedback and distortion-laden guitar wash. Its that grit under the soaring, delicate, hauntingly ethereal vocals that gives em the sound that makes the hairs on the back of my neck stand up. And I love telecasters. Both = even better. Can't wait to hear the result! Oh yeah-- that sound? from what I can tell the Bridges don't have it. I didn't give them much of a chance, but from what I've heard they sound quite generic and boring (-sorry kim). They do look uncannily like a studied imitation in the vid though. |
|
|
Joined: 06 Jan 2008 | Posts: 1762 | Location: Dallas
|
|
|
well, i didn't mean to sound like i don't like Chauntelle's guitar sound (i do!), it's just that when i listen to most music today the guitar is always so drenched in distortion and other effects that i can't even hear it, and it's kind of refereshing to hear a new band going for a sound a little more clean, and a little more old-fashioned (especially since that's the way i play!) |
|
|
Joined: 23 Mar 2006 | Posts: 1126 | Location: Temple Terrace, Florida
|
|
|
OK...well then...thanks everyone for your comments...even though some I consider a little unresearched and inexperienced...but none the less they are amusing! So...I have been in my shop carving and sanding away at this new creation for Chauntelle....Rooting through my personal wood stash I came across a couple of pieces of wood that are gonna make this tele have a tone all it's own!! The fingerboard and the head plate are very rare Brazilian Rosewood. These pieces happen to be some of the best I have ever seen!! No Lie!! Perfectly quartersawn and dark in color!! I wish you guys could smell the sweetness of this wood! [img]
Heres a full shot! [/img]
If thats not enough I decided to use East Indian Rosewood for the neck!! One incredible quartersawn piece!! Very purple in color and has a real spicy aroma....but man it will help this tele chime like church bells!! [img]
Well thats all for now...updates to come!! And please I love the comments!! [/img] _________________ "...and nobody owns, the pleasure of tones...that belongs to a guy with no ear..." |
|
|
Joined: 28 May 2008 | Posts: 31 | Location: tyler, texas
|
|
|
|
|
|
Laughing City Forum Index -> eisleyBlog -> Chauntelle's new guitar?
Page 3 of 11 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |
|
|
All times are GMT - 12 Hours
|
|

